S5 Episode 7: COP 30, mega-cops, and meaningful participation with Hayley Walker

In this episode, we are joined by Dr. Haley Walker from the Department of International Negotiation and Conflict Management, IÉSEG School of Management (Lille). We discuss the outcomes of COP30, held in Brazil, Dr. Walker’s insights into the successes and disappointments of COP30, and the disparity between expectations and actual outcomes. We hear about the differences between the negotiation and implementation facets of COP events, the increasing size of COPs post-Paris, and the challenges and potential solutions for effective participation and meaningful impact. Hayley emphasises the need to shift focus from negotiations to implementation and suggests greater utilisation of virtual participation and regional climate weeks to enhance inclusivity and effectiveness.

00:48 Discussing COP 30 Outcomes

02:22 Expectations vs. Reality at COP 30

04:01 The Role of the Action Agenda

06:02 Brazilian Presidency's Agenda Shift

07:59 Cover Decisions and Their Impact

09:42 Research on Non-State Actors

13:17 Media's Role in COP Coverage

15:45 Negotiation vs. Implementation at COP

21:29 Debunking Rage Bait in Climate Reporting

22:21 The Real Fossil Fuel Lobbying Happens Elsewhere

23:29 Youth Activism and Effective Climate Action

24:38 Understanding the Concept of Mega COPs

26:42 Challenges of Overcrowded COPs

27:17 Party Overflow and Its Implications

31:56 Virtual Participation and Downsizing COPs

34:11 Beyond COP: Year-Round Climate Work

37:09 Media Perception and COP Legitimacy

41:40 Concluding Thoughts and Future Directions

The Conversation: The problem with ‘mega-COPs’: can a 50,000-person conference still tackle climate change?

Academic article: Access and meaningful participation of non-state actors in the UNFCCC process: path-dependencies in the era of ‘mega-COPs’

In-person workshop: How to use CDA in your research project

Language & Power Podcast Webpage

Discourse Academy Webpage

Next
Next

S5 Episode 6: Jewish co-resistance to colonial disinformation